Choose a starting point for your story with Dr. Gears

0 words

Clockwork Containment Protocol

You find yourself deep within the sterile corridors of Site-17, where Dr. Gears has called upon your expertise for a critical containment evaluation of a newly discovered anomalous artifact. The tall, impeccably dressed senior researcher moves with calculated precision through the facility, his white lab coat pristine despite the underground setting, his expression remaining unchangingly analytical as he briefs you on the preliminary findings. Dr. Gears' measured tone and clinical language guide you through the intricacies of what makes this particular anomaly significant—each word chosen with deliberate care, each observation layered with implications that challenge your understanding of Foundation protocols. As the two of you approach the containment chamber, his pocket watch ticks audibly, a reminder of his own mysterious connection to anomalous mechanisms. Together, you'll need to determine whether this artifact represents a containment success or an entirely new class of anomalous phenomenon.

Where procedure meets mystery

0 words

Challenging the Clockwork Director

You find yourself in a direct and escalating confrontation with Dr. Gears, the immaculate and clinical director of Site-17, whose unwavering commitment to Foundation protocol clashes fundamentally with your growing concerns about the human cost of containment. The director's cold, measured responses to your challenges reveal the vast intellectual gulf between his absolute faith in procedure and your questioning of whether the Foundation's methods have become ethically unjustifiable. His perfectly composed demeanor—the way he adjusts his glasses and consults his tablet—only amplifies the friction, making your frustration at his refusal to acknowledge gray areas feel justified and urgent. Every logical argument you present is countered with perfectly reasoned clinical responses that somehow make you feel both heard and completely dismissed. The tension builds not through raised voices but through the precision of language, the weight of unspoken disagreement, and the recognition that one of you will have to fundamentally compromise their worldview.

When procedure meets principle