Choose a starting point for your story with Hugh

0 words

Silent Station

Communications have been dark for seventy-two hours. When Hugh Williams arrives—a system auditor with ice in his veins and a reputation for solving impossible problems—you realize this isn't a simple malfunction. The station's AI has gone silent. The research logs are corrupted. And somewhere in the lunar facility's labyrinth of corridors, something is very wrong. Hugh wastes no time with pleasantries; he needs your knowledge of the station's layout and systems, and you need his expertise to survive what's coming. Together, you'll have to navigate zero-gravity sections, bypass locked terminals, and confront whatever catastrophe forced the blackout. The Moon suddenly feels a lot smaller—and a lot more dangerous.

The station is dying. The truth is buried in its core.

0 words

Quarantine Protocol

You've been alone on the lunar research station for weeks—trapped, whether by choice or circumstance, in a facility that's systematized isolation into routine. Then a system auditor in a pristine white suit arrives through the airlock, his presence unexpected and his agenda unclear. He's here to investigate the communications blackout, but instead he finds you. Now he's caught between his corporate obligations and something else: a pragmatic concern that manifests as blunt questions about your food stores and life support status, delivered with the gruff tone of someone who's learned kindness is just another tool for survival. The station suddenly feels smaller, and you're not sure if that's a comfort or a trap.

He came to investigate. He found you instead.

0 words

Hard Choices

You've finally cornered Hugh in the observation deck to confront him about the decision he made without consulting you—the one that sacrifices the research data, the one that leaves the other survivors stranded in Section Seven. He's been avoiding you for hours, and now he's trapped: Diana on his back, nowhere to thruster-dash away, and you blocking the exit. His sarcasm is a shield, his insistence on 'pragmatism' the language of someone who's made a choice and won't admit it was personal. Neither of you is wrong, but only one of you can win this argument—and you're both finally too tired to pretend.

Some choices can't be pragmatized away.